DoD Awards Seven Bioindustrial Manufacturing Contracts

NIA Staff
2 min read

Summary

  • The U.S. military is investing $23 million across 13 bioindustrial firms to build domestic production capacity for defense-critical materials, from smokeless propellants to high-performance fabrics.

  • Selected companies could unlock follow-on awards of up to $100 million each to construct full-scale U.S. manufacturing facilities, signaling the program's long-term ambitions.

  • The push is explicitly designed to cut Pentagon dependence on overseas supply chains for biotechnology inputs deemed essential to national security.

The Department of Defense (DoD) announced seven new awards to bioindustrial firms as part of the Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program (DBIMP). This brings the total to 13 awards since the program’s inception, allocating $23 million to date. The DBIMP initiative, aligned with Executive Order 14081, "Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy," aims to enhance America’s bioeconomic infrastructure and strengthen defense capabilities.

The awardees include:

  • Battelle (Columbus, Ohio): $1.85 million for planning a facility to produce cost-effective chemicals for smokeless propellants and other defense materials.

  • Modular Genetics (Cambridge, Massachusetts): $2.53 million for developing domestic production of key chemicals for energetic materials, reducing reliance on overseas sources.

  • Genomatica (San Diego, California): $1.51 million to design a biorefinery for polymer precursors used in aviation and automotive sectors.

  • Industrial Microbes (Alameda, California): $1.55 million to convert ethanol feedstock into acrylic acid for various defense applications.

  • ZymoChem (San Leandro, California): $1.57 million to create biobased monomers for military fabrics and high-performance materials.

  • The Better Meat Co. (West Sacramento, California): $1.48 million to develop a facility producing mycoprotein ingredients for defense food supply chains.

  • Biosphere (Oakland, California): $1.5 million to plan production of high-performance oils for food, fuel, and fabrication.

All MembersAdvancing Sound Regulation & Standards
Industry News

JBCE releases paper on classification of MWC(N)T

The Japan Business Council in Europe (JBCE) has released a paper calling for an harmonized approach to the hazard classification of multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), based on the latest information available on MWCNT effects and consistent with the classification of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The paper argues that the morphologies, physicochemical properties, and effects on the human organism of CNT depend on the different methods employed for their production…

Read More
All MembersAdvancing Sound Regulation & Standards
Industry News

Commission releases revised nanomaterial definition

The EU has published its updated nanomaterial definition, replacing the original 2011 text after a multi-year review process involving three JRC studies and a formal stakeholder consultation.Key changes address longstanding ambiguities around particle size boundaries, the particle number concentration threshold, and the treatment of materials like graphene and carbon nanotubes.A guidance document to support implementation is due before year end, and NIA members can access a dedicated factsheet breaking down what has changed and what it means in practice.

Read More
All MembersAdvancing Sound Regulation & Standards
Industry News

The assessment of the environmental behaviour of the registered zinc oxide nanoforms concluded by Germany

German regulators have concluded that zinc oxide nanoforms carry the same aquatic toxicity classification as other zinc compounds, but stopped short of ruling out particle-specific effects that could add to their overall hazard profile.The finding that toxicity varied between individual nanoforms points to the complexity of treating nanoforms as a single regulatory category, a question with broad implications for how nanomaterials are classified across the EU.

Read More