ECHA Highlights Regulatory Challenges and Research Needs for Nanomaterials

NIA Staff
1 min read

Summary

  • ECHA is sounding the alarm over critical gaps in analytical methods for nanomaterials, warning that without urgent action the foundations of chemical safety regulation could be undermined.

  • The agency is pressing for faster completion of OECD test method revisions under the Malta Initiative, flagging the work as overdue and essential to keeping regulation functional.

  • Key unresolved areas include toxicokinetic characterisation, biodegradation, bioaccumulation, and long-term effects on soils and sediments, alongside the validation of new approach methodologies for regulatory acceptance.

In June 2024 ECHA published a document highlighting research needs to ensure that the regulatory frameworks remain robust and effective for the chemical safety assessment. The document also included nanomaterials, acknowledges the vast amount of research performed on the adaptation of testing guidelines and guidance for nanomaterials but still highlights that there is a lack of information as well as availability of analytical methods to ensure a proper assessment and these issues could challenge the efficiency of chemical management. The document highlights the missing methods as critical and reports a need for New Approach Methodology (NAMs) validation, so they can be regulatory accepted. Physico-chemical characterisation methodologies to support toxicokinetic assessment, as well as biodegradation, bioaccumulation and long-term effects on sediments and soils are presented as regulatory needs. ECHA highlights the critical need to urgently finalise the ongoing OECD test methods and guidelines revisions under the Malta Initiative as well as the Malta initiative priority list.

Commission releases revised nanomaterial definition

The EU has published its updated nanomaterial definition, replacing the original 2011 text after a multi-year review process involving three JRC studies and a formal stakeholder consultation.Key changes address longstanding ambiguities around particle size boundaries, the particle number concentration threshold, and the treatment of materials like graphene and carbon nanotubes.A guidance document to support implementation is due before year end, and NIA members can access a dedicated factsheet breaking down what has changed and what it means in practice.

Read More

The assessment of the environmental behaviour of the registered zinc oxide nanoforms concluded by Germany

German regulators have concluded that zinc oxide nanoforms carry the same aquatic toxicity classification as other zinc compounds, but stopped short of ruling out particle-specific effects that could add to their overall hazard profile.The finding that toxicity varied between individual nanoforms points to the complexity of treating nanoforms as a single regulatory category, a question with broad implications for how nanomaterials are classified across the EU.

Read More

Ensuring OECD Guidelines for nano and advanced material

Seven years in, the Malta Initiative has released its first Priority List, giving scientists, funders, and regulators a shared roadmap for the nano and advanced materials safety tests that are still missing.Without these tests, innovations in advanced materials face a compliance deadlock, and the Priority List is explicitly designed to break that logjam by directing effort where it is most urgently needed.The NIA helped shape the list from the inside, ensuring that the gap between what industry needs to bring products to market and what regulators can actually test for is front and centre.

Read More