NIA Responds to EUON Survey on Carbon-Based Nanomaterial Detection and Quantification

NIA Staff
2 min read

Summary

  • NIA's submission to ECHA's carbon nanomaterial detection survey flagged particle count metrics as insufficient, calling for research into iron content, surface characteristics, combined exposures, and biodegradation as the real drivers of toxicological risk.

NIA recently contributed to the EUON (ECHA) survey on the state of the art in detecting and quantifying carbon-based nanomaterials. The survey assessed current methodologies, standards, guidelines, and ongoing developments for both carbon-based and multicomponent hybrid nanomaterials. It also sought insights into existing gaps, research priorities, and funding needs in this critical field.

Drawing from the expertise and input of its members, NIA emphasized several key points:

  • Occupational Safety and Exposure Data
    The industry requires clear guidance on managing carbon-based nanomaterials in occupational settings. While technologies exist to collect extensive exposure datasets, further research is needed to build on these foundations and develop more practical solutions for workplace safety.

  • Beyond Total Particle Counts
    Measuring total particle counts is not enough; other parameters significantly influence toxicological outcomes. For example, in the case of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), factors like iron content and surface characteristics may drive toxicity.

  • Combined Exposures and Biodegradation
    Research should address combined exposures to multiple materials in occupational settings and explore the biodegradation behavior of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to better understand long-term impacts.

  • Critical Dimensions for Classification
    Discussions are needed around the critical geometry of MWC(N)Ts for classification under the CLP regulation, particularly regarding maximum length and width thresholds.

  • Need for Standard Samples
    Defined standard samples are essential for enabling consistent data comparison and interpretation across studies, a step that would greatly advance the field.

UK Nanosafety Group (UKNSG) Press Release

The UK Nanosafety Group is releasing its most comprehensive nanomaterial safety guidance yet; then disbanding, making this the definitive final word from the group.The updated guide now covers industrial labs for the first time, reflecting how far commercial nanomaterial research has advanced since 2016.Free to download under a Creative Commons licence, the resource is positioned as essential reading for anyone working with, or planning to work with, nanomaterials.

Read More

NIA Regulatory Director Publishes Analysis on EU Nanomaterial Definition Changes

A shift in how the EU defines nanomaterials could quietly redraw the regulatory map for cosmetics, reclassifying ingredients that industry has long treated as settled.Some titanium dioxide and silica products currently listed as nanomaterials could lose that designation, while carbon black may gain it depending on particle characterization results.Fragmented national implementations are already creating a compliance patchwork across EU member states, years before the regulation is finalized.The revision timeline runs to 2029, but mid-2026 evaluation results will be the first major signal of where regulators are heading.

Read More